Coming conferences
          25+26 June 2015: Urban development in China
Previous conferences
  30 October 2014: Heterogenous resilience: what can we learn fromt the regional impact of shocks?
  13+14 December 2012; Nations and regions/cities after the Great Recession
  6+7 October 2011; Firm heterogeneity and development
  13+14 December 2010; Urban Development: Patterns, Causes, Foundations, and Policy
  15 October 2010; Tjalling C. Koopmans Centennial: Global Warming and Climate Change:
  9 November 2009; Economic Dynamics and Innovation
  30+31 October 2008; Are Cities more important than Countries?

 

 

Urban development in China

Conference 25 and 26 June 2015

 

Organizing institutions:

International Business School Suzhou (IBSS) at Xi'an Jiaotong - Liverpool University (XJTLU)

University of Groningen

Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society (CJRES)

Regional Science Association International (RSAI), and

Regional Science Association of China (RSAC)

 

 

Organizers
   

Tiago Freire, Xi'an Jiaotong - Liverpool University

   

Steven Brakman, University of Groningen

   

Harry Garretsen, University of Groningen

  Charles van Marrewijk, Xi'an Jiaotong - Liverpool University and Utrecht University      

 

Location:

Xi'an Jiaotong - Liverpool University

No. 111 Ren'ai Road

Dushu Lake Higher Education Town SIP

Suzhou 215123

P.R.China

 

Confirmed keynote speaker: Andres Rodriguez-Pose, Professor of Economic Geography, London School of Economics

 

Theme issue: the Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society will publish a theme issue of a selection of papers presented at the conference, subject to the regular refereeing procedure.

 

 

 

Heterogeneous resilience: what can we learn from the regional impact of shocks?

Conference 30 October 2014

 

Organizing institutions:

International Institute of Social Studies (ISS) at Erasmus University Rotterdam

University of Groningen

International Business School Suzhou (IBSS) at Xi'an Jiaotong - Liverpool University (XJTLU)

 

 

Organizers
   

Steven Brakman, University of Groningen

   

Peter van Bergeijk, Erasmus University Rotterdam

  Charles van Marrewijk, Xi'an Jiaotong - Liverpool University and Utrecht University      

 

Location:

International Institute of Social Studies

Kortenaerkade 12

2518 AX, The Hague

The Netherlands

 

Theme issue: Papers in Regional Science will publish a theme issue of a selection of papers presented at the conference, subject to the regular refereeing procedure.

 

 

Nations and regions/cities after the Great Recession: austerity or creative destruction and boom?

Conference 13 and 14 December 2012

 

Organizing institutions:

International Institute of Housing and Urban Development Studies

Ohio State University

University of Groningen

Utrecht University

 

Organizers
   

Mark Partridge, Ohio State University

   

Steven Brakman, University of Groningen

  Charles van Marrewijk, Utrecht University      
Local organizers
  Jan Fransen, International Institute of Housing and Urban Development Studies

 

Location: M-building 2-10 (Rochester hall), The Netherlands

Erasmus University Rotterdam, Woudestein campus, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50.

 

Theme issue: the Journal of Regional Science will publish a theme issue of a selection of papers presented at the conference, with the organizers as guest editors and subject to the regular refereeing procedure.

 

Nations and Regions after the Great Recession; final program  
Venue: Erasmus University Rotterdam; M building 2-10 (Rochester hall)  
  Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands  
  Thursday 13 December 2012  
  Location: M-building 2-10 (Rochester Hall), Erasmus University, Woudestein  
  time speaker(s) and title  
  09:00-09:20 Registration and coffee  
  09:20-09:30 Welcome by Charles/Mark/Steven  
  Chair Charles van Marrewijk  
  09:30-10:10 Steven Brakman, Harry Garretsen, and Charles van Marrewijk  
    Geographic concentration of cross-border M&As in the USA  
  10:10-10:50 Marius Bruehlhart, Celine Carrere, and Frederic Robert-Nicoud  
    Trade and Towns: On the Uneven Effects of Trade Liberalisation  
  10:50-11:10 coffee  
  11:10-11:50 Marcel Timmer, Bart Los, and Gaaitzen de Vries  
    Made in Europe? Trends in international production fragmentation  
  11:50-12:30 Jens Suedekum, Kris Behrens, Yasusada Murata and Giordano Mion  
    Spatial frictions  
  12:30-13:10 lunch  
  Chair Steven Brakman  
  13:10-14:00 Richard Baldwin and Simon Evenett; presented by Charles  
    Value creation and trade in 21st century manufacturing  
  14:00-14:40 Yasusada Murata, Ryo Nakajima, Ryosuke Okamoto and Ryuichi Tamura  
    Localized knowledge spillovers and patent citations: A distance-based approach  
  14:40-15:00 coffee  
  15:00-15:40 Guhan Venkatu and Tim Dunne  
    Credit growth, contraction and recovery in US metropolitan areas  
  15:40-16:20 Mark Partridge  
    International trade and local labor markets  
  16:20-17:00 Dan Rickman  
    The Great Recession of 2007 to 2009 and Nonmetropolitan America  
  18:30 dinner  
       
  Friday 14 December 2012  
  Location: M-building 2-10 (Rochester Hall), Erasmus University, Woudestein  
  time speaker  
  08:40-09:00 Registration and coffee  
  Chair Ronald Wall  
  09:00-09:40 Klaus Desmet  
    The spatial development of India  
  09:40-10:20 Justin Ross  
    The Public Financing of America’s Largest Cities in the Wake of The Great Recession  
  10:20-10:40 coffee  
  10:40-11:30 Jacques Thisse  
    On the number and size of jurisdictions within large metropolitan areas  
  11:30-12:10 Rikard Forslid  
    title: tba  
  12:10-13:00 lunch  
  Chair Mark Partridge  
  13:00-13:50 Matthew Turner  
    The role of infrastructure on productivity and population growth in Chinese cities  
  13:50-14:30 Ronald Wall  
    The relative position of South Holland within evolving FDI networks  
  14:30-14:40 Closing remarks Charles/Mark/Steven  
  14:40-15:00 drinks  
       

 

The history of the origins of the Great Recession is just starting to be written. Its causes include the collapse of real estate bubbles, poorly understood financial instruments, lax governmental regulations, and contagion facilitated by globalization. The Great Recession and subsequent fallout has created great economic hardship and government austerity measures limit the ability of regions to support economic growth. Yet, the Great Recession obscured some major trends that were realigning the competitiveness of nations and regions well before its onslaught. For instance, outsourcing and globalization have long been shifting manufacturing and even advanced technology industries to lower-cost developing and transition economies, while China and other Asian countries have become among the world’s most dynamic economies. Migration patterns in Europe have been altered, while U.S. migration flows have greatly declined. Even environmental challenges differentially affect cities and regions, creating opportunities for some and critical problems for others.

The upshot is that national and regional growth patterns have altered as talented workers have moved, industries have realigned, and historic patterns of innovation have shifted. Nations, Regions and Cities that appeared very competitive may no longer be so, while the emergence of new industries gives seemingly uncompetitive regions an opportunity to prosper. So, what is the future of existing and emerging global cities and do these structural changes create opportunities for lagging and peripheral regions?

To assess the realignment of cities and regions in the wake of the Great Recession, we are convening a workshop of some of the world’s leading scholars from Asia, Europe and North America to discuss and debate how economic patterns of cities and regions have been altered by the Great Recession and concurrent trends.

 

 

Conference 6 and 7 October 2011

Firm heterogeneity and development

 

Utrecht University (Department of Economics) and

International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam

 

Organizers
   

Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, International Institute of Social Studies

  Charles van Marrewijk, Utrecht University School of Economics      
Local organizers
  Marc Schramm, Utrecht University School of Economics
  Mariska van Dort, Utrecht University School of Economics J.M.vanDort@uu.nl

Location: Utrecht University, details to be announced.

Special issue: the Journal of International Trade and Economic Development will publish a special issue of a selection of papers presented at the conference, with the organizers as guest editors and subject to the regular refereeing procedure.

Firm heterogeneity and development; program (update 27 September 2011)  
Venue: Academiegebouw, Domplein 29, Utrecht  
  Thursday 6 October 2011      
  Location: Kannunnikezaal, entrance: Achter de Dom 7a, Utrecht  
    (Ring the bell; within seconds open the door and follow the stairs to the room)  
  time speaker co-authors title  
  09:00-09:20 Registration and coffee    
  09:20-09:30 Welcome by Charles van Marrewijk  
  Chair Jean-Marie Viaene    
  09:30-10:10 Bedi, Arjun   Job creation in Sub-Saharan Africa abstract 
      Shiferaw, Admasu  
  10:10-10:50 Bergeijk, Peter van Firm Heterogeneity: A Meta Analysis paper
      Mebratie, Anagaw  
  10:50-11:10 coffee      
  11:10-11:50 Pasquier-Doumer, Laure The informal sector in 7 African countries paper
  11:50-12:30 Molina, Ana Cristina Diversification: the case of Mali paper
      Iacovone, Leonardo  
  12:30-13:30 lunch      
  Chair Selwyn Moons  
  13:30-14:30 Naude, Wim   Do Dev. Country Entrepreneurs Internationalize?    
  14:30-15:10 Vaillant, Julia   Economic dynamics in Madagascar, 1954-2004 abstract
      Grimm, Michael  
      Lay, Jann    
      Roubaud, Francois  
  15:10-15:30 coffee      
  15:30-16:00 Erik Stam   Industrial dynamics and economic geography paper
      Elena Cefis  
      Koen Frenken  
  16:00-16:30 Jacob Jordaan FDI spilovers and local suppliers paper
  16:30-17:00 Swart, Julia   IIT and heterogeneity in pollution emission  
      Marrewijk, Charles van  
  18:30 dinner      
           
  Friday 7 October 2011      
  Location: Belle van Zuylen zaal, Domplein 29, Utrecht  
  time speaker co-authors title  
  09:00-09:20 Registration and coffee    
  Chair Harry Garretsen    
  09:20-10:00 Shiferaw, Admasu Multi-product Firms in Ethiopia paper
  10:00-10:40 Peluffo, Adriana Regional Integration and Plant Dynamics paper
  10:40-11:00 coffee      
  11:00-11:40 Nordman, Christophe Entrepreneurship and soc. networks in Vietnam abstract
      Grimm, Michael  
      Chi, Nguyen Hu  
  11:40-12:20 Chang, Han-hsin Firm heterogeneity: evidence from Latin America paper
      Marrewijk, Charles van  
  12:20-13:20 lunch      
  Chair Steven Brakman    
  13:20-14:00 Tamminen, Saara Firm heterogeneity in Finland  
      Chang, Han-hsin  
      Marrewijk, Charles van  
  14:00-14:40 Kinuthia, Bethuel K. Learning from foreign firms? Evidence from Kenya paper
  14:40-15:00 coffee      
  15:00-15:30 Garoma, Belay File Success in Addis Ababa’s urban informal sector abstract
      Dijk, Meine Pieter van  
  15:30-16:00 Mebratie, Anagaw FDI and productivity in S. Africa paper
      Bedi, Arjun    
  16:00-16:15 Closing remarks Peter van Bergeijk  
  16:15-17:00 drinks      
           

 

Participants

  author(s) affiliation Country email short title
1 Molina, Ana Cristina WTO Switzerland AnaCristina.Molina@wto.org Diversification: the case of Mali
  Iacovone, Leonardo World Bank USA Liacovone@worldbank.org  
2 Gattai, Valeria Un of Milan Italy valeria.gattai@unimib.it Chinese ODI at the Firm-Level
  Mancusi, Maria Luisa Bocconi Un Italy ??  
3 Shiferaw, Admasu Un of Goettingen Germany a.shiferaw@uni-goettingen.de Job creation in Sub-Saharan Africa
  Bedi, Arjun ISS Erasmus Netherlands bedi@iss.nl  
4 Mebratie, Anagaw ISS Erasmus Netherlands ?? FDI and productivity in S. Africa
  Bedi, Arjun ISS Erasmus Netherlands bedi@iss.nl  
5 Peluffo, Adriana Un Rep Uruguay Uruguay adriana.peluffo@gmail.com Regional Integration and Plant Dynamics
6 Shiferaw, Admasu Un of Goettingen Germany a.shiferaw@uni-goettingen.de Multi-product Firms in Ethiopia
7 Mebratie, Anagaw ISS Erasmus Netherlands ?? Firm Heterogeneity: A Meta Analysis
  Bergeijk, Peter van ISS Erasmus Netherlands bergeijk@iss.nl  
8 Naude, Wim UN Un Helsinki Finland Wim@wider.unu.edu Do Dev. Country Entrepreneurs Internationalize?  
9 Chang, Han-hsin Un of Utrecht Netherlands h.chang@uu.nl Firm heterogeneity: evidence from Latin America
  Marrewijk, Charles van Un of Utrecht Netherlands j.g.m.vanmarrewijk@uu.nl  
10 Swart, Julia Erasmus Un Netherlands j.swart@tinbergen.nl IIT and heterogeneity in pollution emission
  Marrewijk, Charles van Un of Utrecht Netherlands j.g.m.vanmarrewijk@uu.nl  
11 Grimm, Michael ISS Erasmus Netherlands ?? Entrepreneurship and soc. networks in Vietnam
  Chi, Nguyen Hu DIAL Un de Paris XIII France ??  
  Nordman, Christophe DIAL Un de Paris XIII France nordman@dial.prd.fr  
12 Pasquier-Doumer, Laure DIAL Un de Paris XIII France pasquier@dial.prd.fr The informal sector in 7 African countries
13 Kinuthia, Bethuel K. African Studies Cen. Netherlands bkinuthia@ascleiden.nl Learning from foreign firms? Evidence from Kenya
14 Dijk, Meine Pieter van IHS Erasmus Netherlands mpvandijk@few.eur.nl Success in Addis Ababa’s urban informal sector
  Garoma, Belay File IHS Erasmus Netherlands belayfile@yahoo.com  
15 Brakman, Steven Un of Groningen Netherlands s.brakman@rug.nl Heterogeneity in development
16 Tamminen, Saara Gov Inst of Ec Research Finland saara.tamminen@vatt.fi Firm heterogeneity in Finland
  Chang, Han-hsin Un of Utrecht Netherlands h.chang@uu.nl  
  Marrewijk, Charles van Un of Utrecht Netherlands j.g.m.vanmarrewijk@uu.nl  
17 Grimm, Michael ISS Erasmus Netherlands ?? Economic dynamics in Madagascar, 1954-2004
  Lay, Jann Un of Goettingen Germany ??  
  Roubaud, Francois DIAL Viet Nam Viet Nam ??  
  Vaillant, Julia DIAL Un de Paris XIII France vaillant@dial.prd.fr  
18 Erik Stam Utrecht University Netherlands e.stam@uu.nl Heterogeneity, entrepreneurship, and growth
  Andre van Stel EIM Policy Research Netherlands info@eim.nl  
19 Jacob Jordaan Free Un Amsterdam Netherlands j.a.jordaan@vu.nl FDI spillovers and local suppliers

 

 

 

 

Conference 13 and 14 December 2010

Urban development: patterns, causes, foundations, and policy

 

Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS), Erasmus University Rotterdam

Utrecht University (Department of Economics and Faculty of Geosciences)

 

Organizers
   

Michael Storper, London School of Economics

  Charles van Marrewijk, Utrecht University School of Economics      
  Frank van Oort, Utrecht University Faculty of Geosciences 
Local organizer
  Ronald Wall, Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies

 

Special issue

A selection of papers presented and discussed at the workshop will be published as a special issue of the Journal of Regional Science, edited by the organizers, subject to a standard referee procedure. Similarly, a selection of papers will be eligible for publication in Regional Studies, subject to a standard referee procedure.

Urban Development: Patterns, Causes, Foundations, and Policy  
  Monday 13 December 2010      
  time speaker co-authors title  
  08:45-09:30 Registration and coffee    
  09:30-09:45 Introduction by Kees van Rooijen (director IHS)  
    Opening Frank van Oort    
  Chair Charles van Marrewijk    
  09:45-10:30 Ron Boschma Frank Neffke How do regions diversify over time?  
    Martin Henning    
  10:30-11:15 Ronald Wall Martijn Burger M&A flows and the impact on European regions  
      Frank van Oort    
  11:15-11:45 coffee      
  11:45-12:45 Janet Bercovitz Maryann Feldman Entrepreneurism and the mechanisms of collaboration  
  12:45-13:45 lunch      
  Chair Michael Storper      
  13:45-14:30 Steven Brakman Harry Garretsen Eliminating the costs of remoteness: evidence from EU integration  
      Charles van Marrewijk    
      Abella Oumer    
  14:30-15:15 Hernan Rozenfeld Diego Rybski The Area and Population of Cities: New Insights from a Different Perspective on Cities  
      Xavier Gabaix    
      Hernan Makse    
  15:15-15:45 coffee      
  15:45-16:45 Sukkoo Kim Marc Law History, institutions, and cities: a view from the Americas  
  18:30 dinner      
           
  Tuesday 14 December 2010      
  time speaker co-authors title  
  08:45-09:00 Registration      
  Chair Ronald Wall      
  09:00-09:45 Meine Pieter van Dijk The contribution of cities to economic development: explanation based on Chinese cities  
  09:45-10:30 Raymond Florax Thomas de Graaff Sectoral differences in urban concentration  
      Frank van Oort    
  10:30-11:00 coffee      
  11:00-12:00 Simona Iammarino Elisabetta Marinelli Is the grass greener on the other side of the fence?  
  12:00-12:45 Harry Garretsen Ron Martin Resilience to shocks  
      Bernard Fingleton    
  12:45-13:45 lunch      
  Chair Frank van Oort      
  13:45-14:45 Michael Storper Tom Kemeny Amenities, Specialization, Institutions: What Explains US Metropolitan Income Levels?  
  14:45-15:30 Philip McCann   Agglomeration, networks and the fundamentals of EU cohesion policy  
  15:30-16:00 Closing remarks by Ronald Wall    
  16:00 drinks      
           

 

 

Authors Affiliation Email
Hernan Rozenfeld American Physical Society hernanrozenfeld@gmail.com
Diego Rybski Potsdam Institute diego.rybski@pik-potsdam.de
Xavier Gabaix New York University xgabaix@stern.nyu.edu
Hernan A. Makse City College NY hmakse@lev.ccny.cuny.edu
Steven Brakman University of Groningen s.brakman@rug.nl
Harry Garretsen University of Groningen j.h.garretsen@rug.nl
Charles van Marrewijk Utrecht University J.G.M.vanMarrewijk@uu.nl
Ron Boschma Utrecht University r.boschma@geo.uu.nl
Raymond Florax Purdue University rflorax@purdue.edu
Thomas de Graaff Free University Amsterdam tgraaff@feweb.vu.nl
Harry Garretsen University of Groningen j.h.garretsen@rug.nl
Ron Martin University of Cambridge ron.martin@geog.cam.ac.uk
Bernard Fingleton University of Cambridge bf100@ac.cam.uk
Sukkoo Kim Washington University soks@artsci.wustl.edu
Maryann Feldman University of North Carolina maryann.feldman@unc.edu
Philip McCann University of Groningen p.mccann@rug.nl
Simona Iammarino London School of Economics s.iammarino@lse.ac.uk
Ronald Wall Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies wall@ihs.nl
Martijn Burger Erasmus University mburger@ese.eur.nl
Michael Storper London School of Economics m.storper@lse.ac.uk
Tom Kemeny    
Elisabetta Marinelli London School of Economics  
Frank van Oort Utrecht University fgvoort@hetnet.nl
Meine Pieter van Dijk UNESCO-IHE m.vandijk@unesco-ihe.org
Abdella Oumer University of Groningen a.m.oumer@rug.nl
Janet Bercovitz University of Illinois - Urbana Champaign j.bercov@illinois.edu

 

Urban development: patterns, causes, foundations, and policy

Urban development is not evenly distributed among cities, and often not stable over time. In interpreting urban development, several types of explanations are suggested in spatial economic disciplines. Some models are more detailed and applied than others – this workshop discusses the value and implications of models by determining their ability to actually describe and predict urban growth patterns, causes, shifts and shocks. To do this, the micro foundations and conceptual and analytical discourses of several types of models are discussed and compared on a solid theoretical and empirical foundation.

    Classical models emphasize long-term, regular and path-dependent development. Models describing the nature and degree of urban concentrations, like Zipf, bell-shapes and other regularities models, are numerous but seem limited in applicability to individual cities. New Economic Geography models introduced agglomerating and dispersing factors for economic activities. Agglomerating effects, where firms are locating close to large markets, are fuelled by mechanisms of market access and minimizing transport costs of firms, benefits of producers and consumers of varieties in cities and the cost of living effect, where consumers minimize transport costs. Dispersing effects are caused by market crowding (firms trying to escape competition), housing costs and congestion. Evolutionary economic geography models hypothesize that urban and regional systems move down pathways, after “branching points” that are mostly technological in character. This more geographically embedded branch of theories focuses on concepts like technological change and lock-in; thresholds in transport and transaction costs; amenity shocks and their causes; and the influence of major political events. In the workshop we want to investigate what are modelling strategies for possibly reconciling these strands of research.

    The workshop will have special attention for the issue of causality in this discussion. There are debates about how to model causal forces in location and urban development. Nowadays, formal modelling does not seem to be possible without proper dealing with causality and endogeneity. This touches on the micro foundations of urban economic development. Again, different conceptual approaches contribute to our understanding of causality in urban development. “New neoclassical” approaches use a spatial indifference function for firms (and other agents, too), while geographers mostly consider this fundamentally wrong, especially for innovative, early in the product cycle and skill intensive activities. This makes one wonder what the temporal sequences and causal hierarchies in urban development are, and which factors do matter more than others. An ever actual question in this respect is whether firm location “precedes” – temporally and causally – household choices, or the other way around. This underlies the fundamental question: do “people go to jobs” or “jobs go to people?” – assuming that we are not satisfied with perfectly simultaneous, all-direction causality. Other causalities that are often taken for granted can be questioned, like clustering, variety and agglomeration. Growing cities might attract more and a varied number of firms and functions than other cities, actually reversing causality on this issue. The same applies to innovation, creativity and housing issues in relation to urban development.

    A body of literature on new industrial districts (NIDs) and collective learning emerged. The research is primarily inward looking, detailing how clusters and learning regions develop, operate and prosper (or fail). As the approaches differ from geographical economics, it is at times difficult to compare models and research outcomes but there are common features that allow cross-fertilization.  External economies play a key role in all, which include non-traded interdependencies such as common services organized by joint action, norms and standards and the importance of trust and social embeddedness of networks. These attribute to a (non-tradable) territorially specific asset, a localized capability, fostered by localised economic governance. We need to study their relative importance for explaining growing agglomerations and the specific forms of governance stimulating growth.

 

Is the grass greener on the other side of the fence?

 

Simona Iammarino & Elisabetta Marinelli

London School of Economics, Department of Geography and Environment

 

Abstract

The ability to attract human capital and the level of satisfaction of the local labour force are increasingly catching the attention of geographers. Indeed understanding the links between migration and job satisfaction can give precious insights, at the micro level, on an important driver of regional development: the concentration of talent. The paper explores this link by analysing the 2001 cohort of Italian graduates and focuses in particular on those coming from the South, the most disadvantaged area of the country. The paper explores how personal characteristics (such as socio-economic background, university performance and other employment features) together with the migration behaviour, impact on job satisfaction with short-term and long-term career outcomes. Methodologically the paper applies generalized ordered logit regressions to a survey on graduates’ entry in the labour market conducted by the Italian National Statistical Institute. We find that leaving the South is a rewarding choice: in both short and long term domains of employment wellbeing, those who left the area are more satisfied than those who stayed, those who moved within the South or those who returned to it after being educated elsewhere. The North-West, in particular, is the area that provides the most fulfilling opportunities and where a large number of graduates concentrate.

 

back

The contribution of cities to economic development: an explanation based on chinese cities

 

Meine Pieter van Dijk , IHS and Institute of Social Studies in The Hague (ISS) of Erasmus University Rotterdam

 

Abstract

To understand the contribution of cities to economic development recent data for Chinese cities will be used. we will use the economic contribution of cities measured by their GDP and growth rate, but we also want to explain their competitiveness by doing regression analysis to find the factors contributing to the attractiveness of Chinese cities as measured by the amount of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) received. Subsequently we want to know are the Chinese cities only booming because of cheap labor, or are they gradually developing into high tech economies, able to generate innovative technology to support their competitiveness? The three topics: the contribution of cities, the explanation of their success and their future competitiveness will lead to some considerations about the importance of economic reform policies at different levels of government and the role of urban and regional managers in this process.

 

back

Border cities and EU integration: A case of diminished transport costs

 

Steven Brakmana, Harry Garretsena, Charles van Marrewijkb, and Abdella Oumera

a University of Groningen, Department of Economics

b Utrecht University School of Economics

 

Abstract

Distance related variables usually only vary in a cross-section dimension between cities, regions, or countries, but hardly in a time dimension. The enlargement of the EU and the introduction of the euro, however, can be looked upon as two natural experiments that shed light on the consequences of changes in remoteness over time. Central in this paper is the notion that cities or regions close to the former border (abolished through EU integration) are affected the most from these policy changes, whereas the effects for cities and regions further away are more subdued. The reason is that for border cities and regions these (sudden) changes in transaction costs are felt more intensely than cities and regions that are located further from the former border. We find strong support at both the city- and regional level that the EU integration process has been beneficial for border cities. The border integration effect is more important for small regions than for large regions (as expected), but more important for large than for small cities (contrary to expectations).

 

back 

The Area and Population of Cities: New Insights from a Different Perspective on Cities

 

Hernan D. Rozenfelda, Diego Rybskia, Xavier Gabaixb, and Hernan A. Maksea

a City College of New York

b New York University

 

Abstract

The distribution of city populations has attracted much attention, in part because it constrains models of local growth. However, there is no consensus on the distribution below the very upper tail, because available data need to rely on “legal” rather than “economic” definitions for medium and small cities. To remedy this difficulty, we construct cities “from the bottom up” by clustering populated areas obtained from high-resolution data. We find that Zipf ’s law for population holds for cities as small as 5,000 inhabitants in Great Britain and 12,000 inhabitants in the USA. We also find a Zipf ’s law for areas.

 

back

History, Institutions and Cities: A View from the Americas

 

Sukkoo Kima and Marc Lawb

a Washington University in St. Louis and NBER

b University of Vermont

 

Abstract

In this paper, we use the familiar strategy of exploiting the quasi-natural experimental distribution of political institutions in the Americas, caused by the European colonial experience, to examine the role of institutions on urban and local development in the Americas. Political institutions, whether unitary or federal and parliamentary or constitutional, matter for urban and local development because they formally and informally define the property rights of federal, regional and local governments. In Latin America, we argue that the centralization of political power in the federal government at the expense of local governments contributed to the rise of urban primacy whereas in North America, political decentralization fostered a more balanced urban and local development. Yet, even between US and Canada, we find that the differences in the levels of political centralization at the state/provincial levels led to important divergences in the organization of cities and local governments between these countries.

 

back 

How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions

 

Frank Neffke*, Martin Henning**, and Ron Boschma***

*          Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: neffke@ese.eur.nl

**        Lund University, Sweden. E-mail: martin@keg.lu.se

***      Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Email: r.boschma@geo.uu.nl

 

Abstract

The question of how new regional growth paths emerge has been raised by many leading economic geographers. From an evolutionary perspective, there are strong reasons to believe that regions are most likely to branch into industries that are technologically related to the pre-existing industries in that region. By employing a new indicator of technological relatedness between manufacturing industries, we use detailed plant-level data to analyze the economic evolution of 70 Swedish regions during the period of 1969-2002. Our analyses show that the long-term evolution of the economic landscape in Sweden is subject to strong path dependencies. Industries that were technologically related to the pre-existing industries in a region had a higher probability of entering that region in comparison to unrelated industries. Industries that were technologically-unrelated to the pre-existing industries of a region had a higher probability of exiting that region. Moreover, we also found that the industrial profiles of Swedish regions showed a high degree of technological cohesion. Despite substantial structural change, this cohesion was very persistent over time. Our methodology also proved useful when focusing on the economic evolution of one particular region. Our analysis indicates that the Linköping region increased its industrial cohesion over a period of 30 years due to the entry of industries that were closely related to its regional portfolio, and the exit of industries that were technologically peripheral. In summary, we find systematic evidence that the rise and fall of industries is strongly conditioned by industrial relatedness at the regional level.

 

back

Recessionary Shocks and Regional Employment: Evidence on the Resilience of UK Regions

 

Bernard Fingletona, Harry Garretsenb & Ron Martinc

a University of Strathclyde, email: bf100@cam.ac.uk

b University of Groningen, email: j.h.garretsen@rug.nl

c University of Cambridge, email: rlm1@cam.ac.uk

 

Abstract

We analyse the resilience of UK regions to employment shocks. Two basic notions of resilience are distinguished. With engineering resilience, there is an underlying stable growth path to which a regional economy rebounds following a shock. With ecological resilience, shocks can permanently affect the growth path of the regional economy. Our data set consists of quarterly employment series for 12 UK regions (NUTS I) for the period 1971-2010. Using a SUR model specification, we test for the relevance of (engineering) resilience of UK regional employment to the 4 recessionary shocks in our sample. It turns out that UK regions do indeed differ in their resilience, but that these differences mainly concern the initial resistance to shocks and not so much the recovery stage. The SUR model does not allow shocks to have permanent effects and it also does not take the possibility of time differentiated shock spillovers between the 12 regions into account. To this end, we also estimate a VECM specification where employment shocks can have permanent effects and where also inter-regional employment linkages are included. We find that employment shocks typically have permanent effects when it concerns the own region effects. Permanent effects can also be found for the impact on other regions but the inter-regional effects are typically only significant for nearby regions.

 

back

 

 

 

Conference 15 October 2010

Tjalling C. Koopmans Centennial: Global Warming and Climate Change

 

Utrecht University School of Economics - USE

Tjalling C Koopmans Research Institute - TKI

To celebrate the 100th birthday of Tjalling C. Koopmans (1910-1985), the 1975 Dutch Nobel Laureate in Economics, its namesake institute is proud to organize the one-day conference: Global Warming and Climate Change in his honour. Tjalling Koopmans was awarded the Nobel Prize (jointly with Leonid Kantorovich) for his contributions to efficient allocation of resources (activity analysis), economic growth (value of time, technology, and population growth), and econometric methods (structural equations, errors, and overidentification). All these aspects play a role in analyzing the complex problems of global warming and climate change facing today’s society.

Keynote speaker William Nordhaus, world leading economist and expert on climate change

Friday 15 October 2010  
location: Polman's Huis, Zuilenzaal  
  Hoek Jansdam & Keistraat  
  3512 HV, Utrecht title
10.00 - 10.30 Arrival, welcome, and coffee  
Chair: Charles van Marrewijk  
10.30 - 10.40 Opening Clemens Kool, head of department USE  
10.40 - 11.20 Hans Schenk, Utrecht School of Economics Koopmans in Retrospective
11.20 - 12.20 Rick van der Ploeg (Oxford University) Climate Change, Distribution, and the Green Paradox
12.30 - 13.30 Lunch  
Chair: Erik Stam  
13.30 - 14.30 Keynote speaker William Nordhaus (Yale University) Global Warming
14.30 - 15.00 Coffee break  
Chair: Janneke Plantenga  
15.00 - 16.00 Maarten Hajer (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency) Climate Change and the Authority of Science
16.00 - 16.20 Discussion: Mark Sanders, Utrecht School of Economics Climate Change and Multidisciplinary Economics 
16.20 - drinks  
organisors Charles van Marrewijk  
  Janneke Plantenga  
  Erik Stam  
practical Mariska van Dort; 030-2539957  
  J.M.vanDort@uu.nl   
Registration: please contact Mariska van Dort for registration (participation is free of charge)

 

 

 

 

 

Previous Conference; 9 November 2009

USE Lustrum - Utrecht University School of Economics

Tjalling C Koopmans Research Institute

 

 

As part of the USE lustrum celebrations on 9-12 November 2009 we organize:

Conference:   Economic Dynamics and Innovation

The world is changing at a rapid pace. New goods and services are invented and distributed across the globe. Innovation and technology changes affect trade flows, investment flows, and how the world is organized. Recent experience has shown that these intricate connections between cities, regions, countries, and continents influences how rapidly shocks are transmitted across the globe, leading to drastic declines in trade flows and production levels. This conference analyzes some of the connections between innovation, technology diffusion, trade interaction, and economic dynamics.

 

Keynote speakers:

 

Wolfgang Keller, University of Colorado

A leading international expert on innovation, technology diffusion, and trade connections.

 

Xavier Gabaix, New York University

A renowned expert, among other things, on the connections between economics and physics (econophysics)

 

Program:   Economic Dynamics and Innovation

USE research program: Multidisciplinary Economics of Change within Firms, Markets, and Sectors

Local organizors:

Jaap Bos, Utrecht University

Charles van Marrewijk, Utrecht University

Date: 9 November 2009

Location: Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Preliminary program

Chair: Frank van Oort, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency

09.45  

Opening by Hans Stoof, Utrecht University

Location: Academiegebouw, Aula

10.00

Keynote speaker:   

Location: Academiegebouw, Aula

Wolfgang Keller, University of Colorado

 

Technology Transfer of Multinational Firms and the Geography of International Transactions Costs

with Stephen Yeaple; link to related paper: http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/3276

10.45

Questions and discussion

Location: Academiegebouw, Aula

11.00

Break

Location: Academiegebouw, Maskeradezaal

Chair: Steven Brakman, University of Groningen

11.30

Keynote speaker:

Location: Academiegebouw, Aula

Xavier Gabaix, New York University

 

The Area and Population of Cities: New Insights from a Different Perspective on Cities

with Hernan Rozenfeld, Diego Rybski, and Hernan Makse

link to paper: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~xgabaix/papers/zipfCCA.pdf

12.15

Questions and discussion

Location: Academiegebouw, Aula

12.30

Lunch

Location: Academiegebouw, Maskeradezaal

 

Chair: Peter van Bergeijk, Erasmus University

Location: Academiegebouw, Belle van Zuylenzaal   

Chair: Harry Garretsen, University of Groningen 

Location: Academiegebouw, Kanunnikenzaal  

13.30

Workshop: Technology and Trade

Jacques Mairesse, Maastricht University 

Are Italian physicists more productive than french physicists? with Michele Pezzoni

 

Erik Stam, Utrecht University

Decline in high-tech regions: the Cambridge case  

 

Discussion (with W. Keller)

Location: Academiegebouw, Belle van Zuylenzaal

Workshop: Spatial Interaction

Jeroen Hinloopen, University of Amsterdam

Comparative advantage, the rank-size rule, and the gravity equation

 

Marc Schramm, Utrecht University

Knowledge spillovers in Hong Kong

Discussion (with X. Gabaix)

Location: Academiegebouw, Kanunnikenzaal

15.45

Break

Location: Maskeradezaal

16.15

Inaugural lecture: Charles van Marrewijk, Utrecht University

Spatial diffusion of technology and the trade collapse

Location: Academiegebouw, Aula

17.15

Drinks

Location: Academiegebouw, Senaatszaal

 

 

Wolfgang Keller

The Area and Population of Cities: New Insights from a Different Perspective on Cities

with Hernan Rozenfeld, Diego Rybski, and Hernan Makse; link: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~xgabaix/papers/zipfCCA.pdf

Technology Transfer of Multinational Firms and the Geography of International Transactions Costs

with Stephen Yeaple; link to related paper: http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/3276

 

Xavier Gabaix

The Area and Population of Cities: New Insights from a Different Perspective on Cities

with Hernan Rozenfeld, Diego Rybski, and Hernan Makse; link: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~xgabaix/papers/zipfCCA.pdf

Abstract:
The distribution of the population of cities has attracted a great deal of attention, in part because it sharply constrains models of local growth. However, to this day, there is no consensus on the distribution below the very upper tail, because available data need to rely on the "legal" rather than "economic" definition of cities for medium and small cities. To remedy this difficulty, in this work we construct cities "from the bottom up" by clustering populated areas obtained from high-resolution data. This method allows us to investigate the population and area of cities for urban agglomerations of all sizes. We find that Zipf's law (a power law with exponent close to 1) for population holds for cities as small as 12,000 inhabitants in the USA and 5,000 inhabitants in Great Britain. In addition, we identify a new empirical rule: the distribution of city areas is also close to a Zipf's law. We provide a parsimonious model with endogenous city area that is consistent with those findings.

 

Jacques Mairesse

Are Italian physicists more productive than french physicists? Prima-facie Evidence on the Importance of Collaboration in Scientific Research

with Michele Pezzoni

Abstract:
In this paper we investigate why the productivity of physicists in terms of publications (numbers and average journal impact factor) appears much higher in Italy than in France. We are thus led to compare separately the productivity of physicists working in universities and in the two main Public Research Organizations (PROs) in the two countries (CNRS and CNR). We also have to abstract from differences in the participation to "big research project" resulting in publications with numerous co-authors. Finally, we analyze the different styles of cooperation between physicists in the two countries. We conclude by some considerations on the importance of collaboration in the productivity of scientific research, and on the ensuing measurement issues of productivity at the individual scientist level.

 
Jeroen Hinloopen

Comparative advantage, the rank-size rule, and the gravity equation

 

Abstract:

Using a comprehensive international trade data set we document stylized facts of comparative advantage as measured with the Balassa index. In particular we investigate empirical regularities known as Zipf’s Law or the rank-size rule for the distribution of the interaction between countries as measured by revealed comparative advantage. Using the recently developed estimator by Gabaix and Ibragimov (2007) we find strong evidence in favor of the rank-size rule along the time, country, and sector dimension for three different levels of data aggregation. The estimated Pareto exponents that characterize the distribution of revealed comparative advantage are stable over time but differ across countries and sectors. These differences are related empirically to country and sector characteristics, including population size, GDP, and factor intensities. Next we consider to what extent revealed comparative advantage explains bilateral trade-flows. Preliminary results indicate that the Balassa index adds significantly to the explanatory power of the gravity equation.

 
Erik Stam

Decline in high-tech regions: the Cambridge case

 

Abstract:

This paper analyses mechanisms of industrial decline and renewal, illustrated with empirical evidence on the Cambridge high-tech region. The paper contributes to ecological (carrying capacity) and evolutionary (path dependence) theories of regional industrial development. It provides a longitudinal, multilevel analysis of invention, firm, and industry dynamics and change in the supply and costs of regional resources in order to explain decline in high-tech regions. While expansion of the Cambridge high-tech region has been sustained over time, recently forces of decline have been stronger than those of renewal. Decline in employment was most marked in the local telecommunications and biotech sectors, while the creation of variety by new firms fell off most strongly in the local IT software & services industry. Increasing diseconomies of agglomeration are in evidence, together with a contraction of finance that may have been a harbinger of financial stringency to come

 

 

 

 

 

Previous conference; 30 and 31 October 2008

IHS - Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies

Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR)     (back to top)

 

In celebration of its 50th anniversary IHS/EUR organizes a two-day workshop entitled:

 

Are cities more important than countries?

 

Local organizers
   

Steven Brakman, University of Groningen

  Charles van Marrewijk, IHS-Erasmus University Rotterdam 
Dates
  Thursday 30 October 2008
  Friday 31 October 2008

 

According to the United Nations Population Fund[1]: “In 2008, the world reaches an invisible but momentous milestone: For the first time in history, more than half its human population, 3.3 billion people, will be living in urban areas.” Along with the rising urbanization, the value of production is increasingly located in cities and the majority of wealth is created there. City mayors are making direct deals with multinational firms on location decisions and investment opportunities. People use the amenities of their direct urban surroundings, created and maintained by city authorities. This raises the question if the city in which you are living is becoming more important for your welfare than the country in which you are living.

 

Program

Location: Erasmus University Rotterdam, Woudestein campus, T-building, 14th floor

 

Thursday 30 October 2008

time

speaker

co-author(s)

title

09.00-09.20

Coffee

 

 

09.20-09.30

Welcome by Philip Hans Franses (Dean Faculty of Economics) and Charles van Marrewijk

Chair Harry Garretsen

09.30-10.15

Frederic Robert-Nicoud

C.Hilber

Owners of developed land versus owners of undeveloped land: why land use is more constrained in the Bay area than in Pittsburg

10.15-11.00

Gerrit-Jan Knaap

S. Lewis

J.I. Carruthers

R.N. Renner

The spatial structure of cities in the US: A special econometric analysis of urban form

11.00-11.30

Coffee

 

 

11.30-12.15

Jens Suedekum

R.A. Lopez

Vertical industry relations, spillovers, and productivity: evidence from Chilean plants

12.15-13.15

Lunch

 

 

Chair Mark Partridge

13.15-14.15

Edward Glaeser (video conference)

Did the death of distance hurt Detroit and help New York?

14.15-15.00

Michael Pflueger

R. Borck

Commuting within and between cities - a new economic geography perspective

15.00-15.30

Coffee

 

 

15.30-16.30

Gianmarco Ottaviano

G. Prarolo

Cultural identity and productivity growth in cosmopolitan cities

16.30-17.15

Jan Fransen

M.-P. v Dijk

Informalisation in Ethiopian cities

19.00

Conference dinner

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday 31 October 2008

 

 

Chair Peter van Bergeijk

09.00-09.45

Rick van der Ploeg

S. Poelhekke

Growth, foreign direct investment, and urbanization: unbundling spatial lags

09.45-10.30

Philip McCann

Z. Acs

Countries, cities, and multinational firms

10.30-11.00

Coffee

 

 

11.00-12.00

Stephen Redding

R. Griffith

Technological Catch-up and the Role of Multinationals

 

 

H. Simpson

 

12.00-12.45

Charles van Marrewijk

S. Brakman

Economic geography within and between European nations: density, urbanization, and market potential

 

 

H.Garretsen

12.45-13.45

Lunch

 

 

Chair Jean-Marie Viaene

13.45-14.30

Kristian Behrens

F. Robert-Nicoud

Survival of the fittest in an urban environment: Agglomeration, selection and polarisation

14.30-15.30

 Jacques Thisse

C. Gaigne

Aging nations and the future of cities

15.30-16.15

Dirk Stelder

 

Two versus many: the geographical dimension in NEG models

16.45-17.00

Closing remarks by Steven Brakman

  Drinks

 

 

 

The Journal of Regional Science, a leading journal in urban and regional research, edited by Marlon G. Boarnet, Matthew Kahn, and Mark Partridge and published by Blackwell Publishing, 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 022148-5020, USA, will devote a special issue of its journal to a selection of conference articles.[2]

 

 

 
List of participants
 

participant

affiliation

country

e-mail address

1

Gianmarco Ottaviano

University of Bologna

Italy

gianmarco.ottaviano@unibo.it

2

Stephen Redding

London School of Economics

UK

S.J.Redding@lse.ac.uk

3

Jacques Thisse

CORE and UCL

Belgium

thisse@core.ucl.ac.be

4

Edward Glaeser

Harvard University

USA

eglaeser@kuznets.fas.harvard.edu

5

Rick van der Ploeg

University of Oxford

UK

rick.vanderploeg@economics.ox.ac.uk

6

Frederic Robert-Nicoud    

London School of Economics

UK

F.L.Robert-Nicoud@lse.ac.uk

7

Gerrit Knaap

University of Maryland

USA

gknaap@umd.edu

8

Jens Suedekum

University of Duisburg

Germany

jens.suedekum@uni-due.de
9

Kristian Behrens

University of Quebec Montreal

Canada

behrens.kristian@uqam.ca

10

Michael Pflueger

University of Passau

Germany

Michael.Pflueger@Uni-Passau.De

11

Philip McCann

University of Waikato

New Zealand

pmccann@waikato.ac.nz

12 Mark Partridge Ohio State University USA
partridge.27@osu.edu
13 Peter van Bergeijk Ministery of Economic Affairs Netherlands P.A.G.vanBergeijk@minez.nl
14 Sjef Ederveen Ministery of Economic Affairs Netherlands S.ederveen@minez.nl
15 Steven Poelhekke Dutch Central Bank Netherlands s.poelhekke@dnb.nl
16 Albert van der Horst Neth Bur Ec Policy Analysis      Netherlands a.van.der.horst@cpb.nl
17

Jan Fransen

IHS

Netherlands

j.fransen@ihs.nl

18

Aloysius Bongwa

IHS

Netherlands

bongwa@ihs.nl

19

Meine-Pieter van Dijk

IHS

Netherlands

vandijk@ihs.nl

20

Harry Garretsen

University of Groningen

Netherlands

j.h.garretsen@rug.nl

21

Steven Brakman

University of Groningen

Netherlands

s.brakman@rug.nl

22 Dirk Stelder University of Groningen Netherlands T.M.Stelder@rug.nl
23 Ana Isabel Moreno University of Groningen Netherlands A.I.Moreno.Monroy@rug.nl
24 Julia Swart Tinbergen Institute Netherlands swart@mail.tinbergen.nl
25 Leon Bettendorf Erasmus University Netherlands bettendorf@few.eur.nl
26

Charles van Marrewijk

Erasmus University

Netherlands

vanmarrewijk@few.eur.nl

27 Jean-Marie Viaene Erasmus Un & Kobe University Netherl & Japan       viaene@few.eur.nl
28

Julian Emami Namini

Erasmus University

Netherlands

emaminamini@few.eur.nl

29 Henri de Groot Free University Amsterdam Netherlands hgroot@feweb.vu.nl
30 Benoit Crutzen Erasmus University Netherlands crutzen@few.eur.nl
31 Frank van Oort Neth. Environm. Assessment Ag.   Netherlands frank.vanoort@pbl.nl
32 Arjen van Witteloostuijn University of Antwerp   Belgium Arjen.vanWitteloostuijn@ua.ac.be
33 Teun Schmidt Erasmus University Netherlands teun.schmidt@gmail.com
34 Cesar Garcia-Diaz University of Antwerp Belgium Cesar.Garcia-Diaz@ua.ac.be
35 Matthijs de Zwaan University of Antwerp Belgium Matthijs.deZwaan@ua.ac.be
36 Yiping Fang IHS Netherlands y.fang@ihs.nl
37 Gerard Marlet Atlas voor Gemeenten Netherlands marlet@atlasvoorgemeenten.nl
38 Ronald Wall Erasmus University Netherlands wall@few.eur.nl
39 Martijn Burger Erasmus University Netherlands mburger@few.eur.nl
40 Frank Neffke Erasmus University Netherlands neffke@few.eur.nl
41  Evert Meijers  Delft Un. of Technology  Netherlands  E.J.Meijers@tudelft.nl 
42  Karin Stibbe    Netherlands  ateliero2@hetnet.nl 
43 Peter Mulder Free University Amsterdam Netherlands pmulder@feweb.vu.nl
44 Maarten Bosker University of Groningen Netherlands E.M.Bosker@rug.nl

 

(back to top)

 


[1] UNFPA (2007), State of world population 2007: unleashing the potential of urban growth,

[2] The Journal of Regional Science has an impact factor of 1.109 and a cited half-life of more than 10 years (ISI Journal Citation Reports, 2006). It is listed in the categories Environmental Studies (impact rank 14 and cited half-life rank 1 out of 52 journals) and Planning & Development (impact rank 11 and cited half-life rank 1 out of 37 journals). Selected articles will undergo the standard refereeing process.

 

This page is maintained by Charles van Marrewijk. comments  

 

 
website stats